; Perceptions of E-mail, Voice Mail and Face-to-Face Communication E-mail I found the e-mail very impersonal and felt detached or even disconnected from its contents. Although I understood the words, I did not perceive that the sender had an urgent need to which I was expected to respond. Honestly, my subconscious reaction might be, in time I shall send the document Jane requested. However, in the meantime, I shall continue to browse my e-mail. Voice Mail Face-to-Face The face-to-face version was the most engaging of the three media. By her smile, Jane conveyed a friendly attitude. Her body language also communicated that she was concerned about my failure to present the ETA; but was willing to negotiate and compromise with me. The Face-to-Face communication conveyed a more complete message as it stimulated both the auditory and visual channels. Moreover, her emphasis on words like your and my helped to distinguish the tasks for which she was responsible from those that required my attention. I definitely got the message that my tardiness was causing her anxiety about being unable to meet her deadline. Factors that Influence How a Message is Received Cox (2009) contends that "no two persons perceive the same event in the same way" (p. 154). The factors that influence the way a message is received include perception, attitudes and beliefs, values, and noise which is any distortion or disruption of the communication process (Cox, D., 2009 p. 154). Perception relates to how a person processes information cognitively. The interpretation of the message is colored by the attitudes, beliefs and values of the individual. For example, if I felt that it was unfair or wrong to allow my negligence to cause Jane to miss her deadline, I would be more be more receptive to the message. By the same token, if as a result of my values, I did not care whether she missed the deadline or not, I would be less receptive. Face-to-Face Communications - More Effective Implications In this week's resources, Dr. Stolovich reminds us that 93% of our communication in non-verbal (Laureate Education Inc.). This suggests that, when we communicate exclusively via e-mail, we lose about 93% of the message . From this, one can conclude that, "important information should first be conveyed face-to-face with all the stakeholders present" (Laureate Education Inc.). The message could be reinforced by telephone conversations and finally via voice-mails or e-mails in that order. Thus, project managers, while taking into the consideration communication media preferences of individual stakeholders, should employ the meeting format: large group, small group or one-on-one; as their first strategy for the dissemination of important information. References: Cox, D., (2009). Project management for instructional designers, a practical guide. IN: iUniverse Goleman, D., (2007, October7). Email is easy to write (and to misread. New York Times. Retrieved September, 21, 2100, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/07/jobs/07pre.html?ref=danielgoleman Laureate Education, Inc. Walden University. (2011) “Communicating with Stakeholders” [Video Webcast]. Retrieved from: http://sylvan.live.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=4894962&Survey=1&47=7389572&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=1&bhcp=1 Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Communicating Effectively
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Learning from a Project "Post-mortem"
An experience that comes to mind is the 2009 Commencement Ceremony of my former institution. Commencement is a major event in the calendar year of any institution. Thus, in order to ensure that the team has enough time to complete activities, the committee is commissioned in March of each year and commencement is scheduled for the penultimate Tuesday in November. The project manager is selected by the Principal and approved by senior management. The team consists of senior administrators and faculty representatives from across the five (5) divisions (schools) of the college. Project team members and other senior faculty also chair sub-committees. My role was mainly that of a driver and, to some extent a sponsor as I authorized resources for the project Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. , 2008 p. 84). Challenges Although the team was commissioned in March, in 2009, project work began mid September. There was no initial planning stage; instead the team began to work immediately premising important decisions on a template of a list of activities from Commencement 2008. The team met weekly but by October, the project seemed to be limping along, and many team members seemed to have lost interest in the project. From my perspective as driver and sponsor, I was not invited to meetings and, looking back, I can remember feeling anxious, wondering if the team would deliver in time for the scheduled date. I lacked information on the progress of work being done and I also felt that the team was making decisions that they were not authorized to make. In addition, the project manager had no authority over members of faculty and was neither skilled in the arts of "negotiation" nor creative problem solving ( Portny, S.et al, 2008 p. 17). Thus, the work of the project was fraught with many interpersonal conflicts .Crisis Immediately, I contacted a former member of faculty who was a floral decorator. We agreed on a theme for the event and she created the floral arrangements. On the morning of the event senior administrators, my secretary, the bursar, our children and other senior members of faculty pressed and hung curtains, decorated the gazebo and ensured that the campus was beautifully decorated for the event. Neither the sub-committee chair nor her team members assisted in this task. Lessons Learned Lesson 1
Lesson 2 Lesson 3 References: Allen, S., & Hardin, P. C. (2008). Developing instructional technology products using effective project management practices. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 19(2), 72–97. Cox, D., (2009). Project management for instructional designers, a practical guide. IN: iUniverse Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
Sunday, September 11, 2011
Welcome To My Blog
Greetings to my classmates of EDUC 6145! I look forward to communicating, and sharing with you during the next eight weeks.
Sonia
Sonia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)